home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!nuchat!xcluud!glnserv!jerryn
- From: jerryn@glnserv.UUCP (Jerry Norris)
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Subject: Re: Usage: To try and find the answer.
- Message-ID: <4DomsB1w164w@glnserv.UUCP>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 04:33:14 CDT
- References: <Bw2ros.GFv@news.iastate.edu>
- Organization: Vermi-net, Houston, Tx. 77098
- Lines: 69
-
- bible@iastate.edu (Anthony E Bible) writes:
-
- /* much written about McMurty's use of "to try and..." vs. "to try to..." */
-
-
- > Secondarily, I would be interested in how much control you
- > think an editor has or should have over the wording in a piece of fiction.
- >
- >
-
- Funny that I read this post tonight instead of yesterday.
-
- A friend and I were talking about writing; the craft, as well as the
- relationship between craft and art, and one of the things that he pointed
- out was a book that contained articles writen by James Blish under the
- name Atheling.
-
- In particular, the article discussed was one concerning flames
- Blish/Atheling was receiving from other writers due to his remarks
- concerning a piece of fiction in Astounding.
-
- In a nutshell, the argument was who has more responsibility over the
- publishing of a poor quality story; the editor for publishing it or the
- writer for doing such a sloppy job.
-
- I haven't read the story, and was only able to read part of the article,
- but Blish gives some descriptions of the crimes perpetrated by the writer.
- Blish went on to say that this story was written by an inexperienced
- writer, who was not at fault for having written a bad story, since part of
- the act of learning to write is to learn how to _not_ write badly (an
- apprenticeship that most people go through hoping to emerge out of as
- quickly as possible). The fault lay with the editor in taking a poorly
- written piece and foisting it onto the readership of the magazine.
-
- Blish went on. According to his viewpoint (and I agree with much of what
- he said), the editor is responsible for three things:
-
- 1) If the story is badly written, the editor should return the manuscript,
- or at the least point out that the story was not accepted because it was
- written badly. It is up to the person in question on how they would
- handle this;
-
- 2) If the story needed a rewrite, the editor should send the manuscript
- back with suggestions on what would make the magazine acceptable.
-
- 3) If the story was worth saving, but deadline time was short
- and little time was left for requesting a re-write or it was needed to
- fill blank space, then, "it was the job of [the editors] to turn it into
- some form of English..."
-
- In the final tally, the editor is responsible for what goes into print,
- and in this case has a great deal of control over the type of story that
- will get published. But it is the writer who is responsible for the
- wording, since it will, after all, be his name on the by-line. Unless it
- is a picayune error in grammar or punctuation; something the writer
- obviously over-looked in the final draft, the editor should allow the
- writer to change it, or to agree to words being changed.
-
- Of course, you're getting advice from someone who hasn't been published
- yet, so these arguments may be so much hot air.
-
- later,
- jerry.
-
-
- email address: xcluud!glnserv!jerryn
-
- All flames judged on original content and local color, with preference
- given to those using cobalt as a coloring agent.
-