home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!VINES.COLOSTATE.EDU!GENE=DODD
- Message-ID: <9210101728.AA44721@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 11:18:01 MDT
- Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion list <IBM-MAIN@RICEVM1.BITNET>
- From: Gene=Dodd%Programming%InfoSys@VINES.COLOSTATE.EDU
- Subject: CA-SORT
- Lines: 15
-
- Hearing the discussion on sorts made me wonder something.
-
- We run CA-SORT and thought that its performance wasn't a major problem for us.
- Maybe we are wrong! Clearly there are those who feel they need to replace
- CA-SORT. What are the environments where the sort is inadequate and how
- did you know or determine that the sort was a problem. Also, is there a
- good way to determine CP and elapsed time in sorts?
-
- Thanks,
- Gene Dodd
-
- Colorado State University
- Unversity Services Center
- Ft. Collins, CO 80523
- (303) 491-1583
-