home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!decwrl!decwrl!infopiz!mccall!ipmdf-newsgate!list
- From: ned@sigurd.innosoft.com (Ned Freed)
- Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.pmdf
- Subject: RE: GATES.RULES file does not look right.
- Message-ID: <01GOJWIT2OVS9S3YK2@SIGURD.INNOSOFT.COM>
- Date: 9 Sep 92 02:07:25 GMT
- Organization: The Internet
- Lines: 9
- Return-Path: <epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU>
- Resent-Date: 08 Sep 1992 19:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU
- Errors-To: epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU
- Resent-Message-ID: <01GOK4FD4IG296VWNM@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU>
- X-Vms-To: IN%"tkslen@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu"
- X-Vms-Cc: IPMDF
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
-
- The GATES.RULES file you posted looks correct to me. The multiple entries
- are a result of the need to hide BITNET addresses behind a route when
- messages are relayed out to the Internet.
-
- The results from PMDF TEST also look correct. The local channel reference
- at the beginning is a chimera; it is the (correct) reference to bit_mailer
- at the bottom you should be concerned with. The headers also look correct.
-
- Ned
-