home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!MATH.AMS.ORG!TJM
- From: TJM@MATH.AMS.ORG (Tom Maloney)
- Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
- Subject: Re: Flat Tax Defended
- Message-ID: <716237998.910203.TJM@math.ams.org>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 18:59:58 GMT
- Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
- Lines: 87
-
- k*nt says:
-
- - David,
- -
- - There will always be someone below the poverty line; right now it is 31
- - million or so "somebodies", a national disgrace attributable in large
- - part to spending for military and income transfer rather than for the
- - development of profit making enterprises such as exploitation of space,
- - so there is no magic "just enough income" that needs respecting by a
- - "progressive" income tax to the detriment of the country. I'm not
- - proposing that the "safety net" stuff be removed, just that it be taxed
- - the same as the rich person's income, so that the poor have as much
- - (you would say "more") reason than the rich to vote for fiscal
- - responsibility in their politicians, rather than pork barrelers.
- -
- - As to your "marginal value of money" example, your math is wrong. Just
- - such a case as you describe used to exist, where some states based
- - their state taxes on a percentage of the federal taxes. When the tax
- - rate on the rich was high enough, this resulted in the ridiculous
- - situation that there were incomes for which the combination of state
- - and federal tax, had tax shelters not been employed, was more than 100%
- - of the income. Put the California state tax of 10.5% on top of the
- - British former highest tax rate of 95%, even as a percentage of just the
- - tax, and you begin to see the problem. For a short time, it even
- - existed in this country, until courts overturned it.
- -
- - Try your scheme, of progressive rates but equal percentage increases
- - when taxes go up, this way. A person taxed at 10% who sees taxes rise
- - 20% loses 2/90ths of his remaining income. A person taxed at 33 1/3%
- - who sees taxes rise 20% loses 9/90ths of his remaining income. Again,
- - the successful are punished for being successful, exactly the wrong
- - social message to send to make a society want to work for success.
- -
- - If the marginal value of a dollar were like the marginal value of an
- - ice cream cone, the practical effect of your analogy, the rich wouldn't
- - work any harder to earn more dollars than a tyke would beg to eat a
- - tenth ice cream cone. To the contrary, the rich work harder for that
- - increment of dollars than do the poor, which is part of the reason they
- - are rich. The average millionaire, according to a US News and World
- - Report snippet several years ago, put in a 60 hour work week, while the
- - average burger flipper was probably putting in a 20-40 hour work week.
- -
- - Money is a promoter of self esteem and a way to keep score in life, not
- - just a consumable good.
- -
- - Thus, money, as a measure of value, is not subject to the same marginal
- - value analysis as goods.
- -
- - The "progressive" income tax, a seductive political idea because the
- - rich are always unpopular (the main Nazi complaint against the Jews
- - was that they were too financially successful), is a destroyer of
- - progress, a simply terrible idea, and one it is time to end. The rich
- - lead enviable life styles, but they also fuel the growth of economies.
- - Depriving them of the wealth that makes that possible, out of envy at
- - their success, hurts everyone, not just the rich.
- -
- - Putting, as we do, the bulk of the tax burden on the middle class just
- - stifles savings and initiative to risk new business, the main force for
- - high employment and a growing economy, so the econometricists tell us.
- -
- - By the way, I also think capital gains should be taxed just like other
- - income, but only real capital gains, with inflation removed before the
- - gain is calculated.
- -
- - It is an obscenity that government is permitted to tax the "gain in
- - value" of an item sold when all that has really happened is that
- - government policy has decreased the value of the dollars in which that
- - (quite possibly non-existant) gain in value is measured. This rewards
- - government for inflation (as does allowing government to be in debt),
- - and so promotes inflationary legislative and administrative policies,
- - the end result of which is to punish the frugal, the old, and others on
- - fixed incomes, and to reward the profligate, the debt ridden, and the
- - overspending Congress.
- -
- - No wonder the US has the lowest private savings rate, and thus the
- - least money to fuel growth, of any industrialized country; our tax
- - system demands just that.
- -
- - Kent, the man from xanth.
- - "The Birthright of humankind is the stars!"
- - --
- - Ignore the header, and don't expect me to see a news reply. Use email to:
- - <dolan@nrlmry.navy.mil> or <dolan@192.138.87.240>
-
- I have no joke, I just like saying "main Nazi complaint"
-
- Tom
-