NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20/NN_1992_20.iso/spool/talk/abortion/36519

Text File | 1992-09-14 | 3.7 KB | 85 lines

Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!gordons
From: [e-mail] (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: THIRD TRIMESTER ABORTIONS
Message-ID: <1=[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 06:30:12 GMT
Organization: Stay Awake Software
References: <[e-mail]> <8cqnc+=[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Lines: 74

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Peter Nyikos) writes:
>In <8cqnc+=[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Gordon Storga) writes:
>
>><[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
>>>From article by [e-mail]:
>>>> In article [e-mail] (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
>>>>> Beware lest somebody come along and second guess the "quality" of _your_
>>>>> lifestyle, Brian, and hence whether _your_ life is "worth living".
>
>>You've alreadyt done this to a degree.  You've already decided that
>>anyone living without your religious views is not living a "quality" life.
>>You'd even like to legislate things so they have to live your views.  In
>>fact, your entire religious viewpoint is that those people who don't live
>>a certain "quality" of life will be *rightfully* killed.
>
>People keep telling me of all kinds of horrible things Suzanne has
>posted in the past.  I haven't seen any that would even remotely
>justify the above statements, and I am calling your bluff: if you have
>any evidence Suzanne said these things, please produce them.

This little gem is from last summer about establishing her theocracy:
=<[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
=>From article by [e-mail] (Eric Marsh):
=>> How long will it be before America becomes a
=>> theocracy?
=>
=>Heh heh heh.  As long as it takes.
----------------------------------------------------

>>Don't you think it's a little hypocritical of you to warn others about
>>"second-guessing" other peoples lifestyle, when you are doing your best to
>>do just that?
>
>And if you can't produce anything, then as far as I'm concerned about
>your further charge of hypocrisy:

Her opinions of "other people's lifestyles" with my comments:
=>In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Gordon Storga)
=writes:
=>> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Suzanne
=Forgach) writes:
=[Article about homosexuals sexual experiences ]
=>> >No, it means their sex means little more than transitory, fleeting
=pleasure,
=>> >since there is no lifegiving capability to it.
=>> Well, I've had a vasectomy.  And I can assure you the love making my
=wife
=>> and I share is not fleeting and serves to remind us of the warm,
=loving,
=>> sensual relationship we share.  And there is no "lifegiving
=capability".
=>> You really ought to try sex for fun instead of the drudgery of
=>> pro-creation.
----------------------------------------------------

From other posts of Suzanne's where she has stated that condoms are the
"tools of the trade" of prostitution you can conclude her opinions of
"abnormal" birthcontrol methods.  I've found these two quotes so far.  If
anyone else out there has more recent stuff, please post it.  My archives
are still a little messed up.

>Are you a Wiccan, like Eric?

Nope.  Why do you ask?


Gordon
Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), and Diana (Sorceress),
and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it.
--
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.