home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!gordons
- From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
- Subject: Re: Roe v. Wade and abortion (was Re: Another good reason to vote for Bush
- Message-ID: <8#vnjw.gordons@netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 03:49:21 GMT
- Organization: Stay Awake Software
- References: <71rn4zf.gordons@netcom.com> <1992Sep10.114559.18850@sniap.mchp.sni.de>
- Lines: 30
-
- <1992Sep10.114559.18850@sniap.mchp.sni.de> frank@D012S436.sniap.mchp.sni.de () :
- >gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
- >: Gee, maybe people should have the right to voice their opposition to black
- >: people living next to them, or Jews, or those icky non-Christians (we all
- >: know that *real* Americans are Christian Republicans). Perhaps you don't
- >
- >Aw Gee, maybe people _should_ have the right to freedom of speech, Gordon...
-
- I agree, Frank. And Doug's original concern was that somehow the Supreme
- Court rulings made it illegal for people to voice their opinions. I was
- attempting to show him that it doesn't really effect the opinions of
- people.
-
- >: like it Doug, but bodily autonomy rights should not be left up to the whim
- >: of the people.
- >
- >No, they should be left to the whim of a small clique instead.
-
- Can you explain a little further. What clique of people would you like to
- leave your rights up to?
-
-
- Gordon
- Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
- Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), and Diana (Sorceress),
- and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it.
- --
- The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
- of whatever company you think I work for. So there, thhhbbbt!
- Message to Kodak: Freedom for Dan Bredy.
-