home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:36011 alt.flame:12722
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!gordons
- From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
- Subject: Re: Revised consistency check
- Message-ID: <5#vnpk.gordons@netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 03:46:05 GMT
- Organization: Stay Awake Software
- References: <1992Aug31.194813.16904@coopsol.com> <Lo1iqB17w165w@mantis.co.uk> <exuptr.445.716052187@exu.ericsson.se>
- Lines: 30
-
- <exuptr.445.716052187@exu.ericsson.se> exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (exuptr@exu.ericsson.se) writes:
- >In article <Lo1iqB17w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes:
- >>From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew)
- >>Subject: Re: Revised consistency check
- >>Date: 3 Sep 92 13:01:08 GMT
- >
- >>gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
- >>> <1992Aug27.233041.22694@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney
- >>> >| Dedicated to achieving civil rights for the unborn
- >>>
- >>> Does this mean that the NRLC is dedicated to achieving civil rights for
- >>> the unborn? Or is this your own idea?
- >>>
- >>> Please tell me how you plan on providing a fetus with a voting stylus. Or
- >>> were you planning on restricting a fetus's right to vote?
- >
- >This is pretty stupid. Like 10-year-olds vote.
-
- I agree, this is pretty stupid. Why anyone would fight for the right to
- vote for fetuses is beyond me.
-
-
- Gordon
- Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
- Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), and Diana (Sorceress),
- and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it.
- --
- The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
- of whatever company you think I work for. So there, thhhbbbt!
- Message to Kodak: Freedom for Dan Bredy.
-