home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20 / NN_1992_20.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 35316 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-09-07  |  1.2 KB  |  36 lines
  1. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.Vanderbilt.Edu!news
  3. From: LIPSCOJA@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu ()
  4. Subject: Re: What if???
  5. In-Reply-To: cookc@aix.rpi.edu's message of Sun, 6 Sep 1992 03:27:09 GMT
  6. Message-ID: <1992Sep6.034653.12421@news.vanderbilt.edu>
  7. Sender: news@news.vanderbilt.edu
  8. Nntp-Posting-Host: ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu
  9. Organization: Vanderbilt University 
  10. References: <j1moody-010992232532@lafmac15.lafortune.lab.nd.edu> <ywxyd5c@rpi.edu> <nyikos.715541196@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <kt1yj9c@rpi.edu>
  11. Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 03:46:53 GMT
  12. X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.21
  13. Lines: 21
  14.  
  15. In <kt1yj9c@rpi.edu> cookc@aix.rpi.edu writes:
  16.  
  17.  
  18. > >Not necessarily.  Kangaroos do develop outside their mothers
  19. > >(mostly in the pouch, true, but still visible) starting
  20. > >at a stage where humans are still called embryos, rather than fetuses, 
  21. > >and they've been around many millions of years longer than humans.
  22. > 
  23. > This is idiotic.  One free clue, Nyikos:  When the joey is in the
  24. > pouch, can you SEE the eyes, ears, etc, as the original poster
  25. > specified?
  26. > 
  27. > >Peter Ny.
  28. > 
  29. >                     -rocker
  30. > 
  31. Maybe not while they're IN the pouch, but definitely while going From the
  32. uterus to the pouch.
  33.  
  34. Andy Lipscomb
  35.  
  36.