home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!bu.edu!inmet!inmet!dlb
- From: dlb@fanny.wash.inmet.com (David Barton)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: Chess Problem
- Message-ID: <DLB.92Sep12135413@fanny.wash.inmet.com>
- Date: 12 Sep 92 18:54:13 GMT
- References: <BuFpLp.9nI@ecf.toronto.edu> <BuGA8t.DL8@cmptrc.lonestar.org>
- Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com
- Organization: Intermetrics Inc., Washington Division, USA
- Lines: 32
- In-Reply-To: carter@cmptrc.lonestar.org's message of 12 Sep 92 05:36:28 GMT
- Nntp-Posting-Host: fanny.wash
-
- In article <BuGA8t.DL8@cmptrc.lonestar.org> carter@cmptrc.lonestar.org
- (Carter Bennett) writes:
-
- So there are 4426165368 possible ways to place the 8 rooks on the
- board. My understanding is that no two rooks can attack each other
- only when they are arranged such that they line up on one of the two
- diagonals of the board. Meaning there are 2 ways out of 4426165368
- possible setups that meet the criteria. Putting that in normalized odds:
-
- No. Each rook has to be in a different row AND a different column
- from every other rook. There are far more than two ways to do this.
-
- Let's see. The first rook can go anywhere; it eliminates fifteen
- squares from possible next placement, leaving 49. The second rook has
- 49 out of 64 squares to choose from and eliminates thirteen squares
- from the next possible placement set, leaving 36. Continuing:
-
- p = 49/64 * 36/64 * 25/64 * 16/64 * 9/64 * 4/64 * 1/64
-
- or, whipping out my handy dandy emacs calculator:
-
- p = 5.77565515416e-6
-
- or
-
- p = .00000577565515416
-
- If I can do this, with my distance from my prob/stat course, it can't
- be THAT hard.
-
- Dave Barton
- dlb@hudson.wash.inmet.com
-