home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.logic
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!alchemy!ruulch!ruulo3!versmiss
- From: versmiss@let.ruu.nl (Koen Versmissen)
- Subject: Re: infinite state automaton
- Message-ID: <versmiss.715952911@ruulo3>
- Organization: Faculty of Arts, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
- References: <UedH4ge00WB80CdOB6@andrew.cmu.edu> <1992Sep8.081401.18506@nntp.nta.no>
- Date: 8 Sep 92 11:48:31 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- klaus@hal.nta.no (Klaus Gaarder FNI) writes:
-
- >A Turing machine can be considered to have an infinite number of states if you
- >define each state by including the contents of the tape in addition to each of
- >the finite number of states, thus giving a countable number of states.
-
- But that doesn't imply that Turing machines are equivalent to ISAs
- (Infinite State Automata). After all, assuming a two-letter alphabet,
- just construct an infinite binary branching tree of states and mark
- all and only the states corresponding to words of the language as
- accepting ones. This gives you a deterministic ISA with a countable
- number of states for any language, in particular for non r.e. ones.
- So Turing machines are strictly weaker than ISAs.
-
-
- Koen Versmissen
- --
- OTS, Universiteit Utrecht, Trans 10, 3512 JK Utrecht, NL
- E-mail: Koen.Versmissen@let.ruu.nl - Tel: (+31) 30-536057
-