home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!pyrnova.mis.pyramid.com!pcollac
- From: pcollac@pyrnova.mis.pyramid.com (Paul Collacchi)
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Subject: Re: Free movement of labour/labor
- Message-ID: <183509@pyramid.pyramid.com>
- Date: 14 Sep 92 21:16:50 GMT
- References: <15387@umd5.umd.edu> <183487@pyramid.pyramid.com> <DAVIDM.92Sep13143538@consilium.com> <1992Sep14.160914.12778@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
- Sender: news@pyramid.pyramid.com
- Reply-To: pcollac@pyrnova.mis.pyramid.com (Paul Collacchi)
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Pyramid Technologies, Mt. View, California.
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Sep14.160914.12778@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>,
- cthorne@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Charles E Thorne) writes:
- |>
- |> One of the reasons we have such a large deficit is that the government is
- |> trying to protect the unemployed or unemployeable and we're borrowing money
- |> (from the Japanese and Europeans) to support this deficit. That will
- |> eventually end and we'll be in the same position Mexico was in when they
- |> couldn't repay their debt.
- |>
-
- I'm not sure I see the underlying mechanics behind these assertions.
- Would you spell them out in a little more detail? Thanks.
-
- Paul Collacchi
-
-