NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20/NN_1992_20.iso/spool/misc/activism/progress/6520

Text File | 1992-09-14 | 7.7 KB | 177 lines

Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
From: [e-mail] (John A Dinardo)
Subject: Part V, PACIFICA RADIO Investigates the Murder of President Kennedy
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: alt.activism.d
Originator: [e-mail]
Keywords: researchers' revelations about the assassination of President Kennedy
Sender: [e-mail]
Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 20:51:23 GMT
Approved: [e-mail]
Lines: 160

        I made the following transcript from a tape recording
        of a broadcast by Pacifica Radio station
               WBAI-FM (99.5)
               505 Eighth Ave., 19th Fl.
               New York, NY 10018       [phone]

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
                        (continuation)
GARY NULL:
Alright, now there are two other very VERY important issues here.
And they are that the photographs of John Kennedy's body, where
he is on his face, lying on his stomach here, it shows ....

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
Lying on his back. There's no picture of him lying on his
stomach.

GARY NULL:
Oh, okay. Yeah, it's been turned around there. I have a picture
of his back, and the first bullet hole ....

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
He's lifted up from the table -- yes.

GARY NULL:
Okay. The first bullet hole is about four inches, it looks like,
below the ....

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
Well the larger hole is not the hole. It's about two inches below
that. You'll see a small red thing, closer to the roller, and
that, the men all state, was a hole. And they also indicate that
that deep depression down toward the bottom of the roller is a
bullet hole.

GARY NULL:
Yeah, well there are two bullet holes in his back. How can a man
have two bullet holes in his back, and then ....

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
I don't know what the answer is, but I do know that there were
gunmen all around that car. In Senator Dodd's report -- that was
appended to the House Committee report when he was in the House
of Representatives -- stated that there were at least three
gunmen firing, and two of them had to have been from behind,
because of the closeness of the shots. There ARE six shots on
that Dallas [motorcycle] police tape recording.

GARY NULL:
Yeah, but you see, the Warren Commission does not state that.

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
No!  They say that three shots were fired and two struck the
President.

GARY NULL:
Also, you have the entire back of the head shown very clearly,
and you do not see the ....

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
No. Part of that is not clear at all. You see the area that's out
of focus there. The background is in focus and the foreground --
where the cowlick [is] closest to the lens of the camera -- is in
focus. But the area all along the hairline from behind the ear
down to the center of the neck (in the hair) is out of focus. And
that's where they smudged all that over when they made their
composite photograph.

GARY NULL:
Alright, what I'd like to do is this. Let's just summarize here
for a moment. What we have are some CLEARLY retouched
photographs. We have more bullet holes in the President's body
than the Warren Commission, or any of the so-called "official"
investigations, have recognized. How in the world does a man end
up with this many proveable bullet holes, and yet, still have
one man doing all the shooting? Some of these bullet holes are
clearly exit wounds. Some are entrance wounds. And yet, the
Warren Commission has, for whatever reason, only presented that
these were rear entrance wounds. The autopsy photographs HAVE
been altered. The X-rays HAVE been altered. It is not possible to
end up with an X-ray .... Let's say if you took a normal anterior
/posterior skull X-ray, and then you took the Kennedy anterior/
posterior skull X-ray -- the Kennedy lateral skull X-ray --
there's an amount of facial bone that's missing. If this were
presented in any regular forensic trial today, it would be
LAUGHABLE. The evidence would be thrown out as inadmissible and
faulty.

We're going to take a brief break. I'd like both Jim Marrs
[author of CROSSFIRE] and also, our guest on the phone right now
-- who just returned from the press conference -- Harrison Edward
Livingstone, who needless to say, was part of the reason that the
AMA called this hasty press conference (and the press conference
itself you'll hear a little later on. We tape recorded some of
it) .... we're going to get to some information that I think the
people in this audience have always wondered about. Are you aware
that not ONCE were we ever given the real reason as to why the
Watergate Break-In occurred?  What was in the safe they were
looking for?  Why did CIA people go into that safe?  Why did Nixon
authorize it?  That brought down the whole Nixon Administration
-- about sixty-seven of his top cronies.  Why? We were never
asked that!  The media never probed it further than what was
given to them.

Well, you're going to hear something when we come back, about the
link between Richard Nixon's men and John Kennedy's killers that
ties the assassination directly to Watergate.
                     (to be continued)
*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

    [JD: There was an incident which remains vivid in my memory, and
     it has never been explored by anyone, though it might provide
     a fuller picture of the possible link between the Watergate
     Break-In and the assassination of President Kennedy.

     Those of you who are old enough will recall the numerous
     Presidential press conferences of Richard Nixon during which
     he was interrogatively flayed and driven to the brink of
     impeachment by a concerted onslaught from the press corps,
     members of which have since been alleged to be journalistic
     prostitutes for the CIA (e.g. Walter Cronkite and, I think,
     Dan Rather, notorious among many). In one of those press
     conferences (I think it may have been the "I'm not a crook!"
     press conference) a reporter asked Nixon [I'm paraphrasing]:
     You said something about the John Kennedy assassination as
     an example or an analogy ....
     And then, Nixon cut him off and exclaimed, with distress:
     "No, no, no! I didn't mean to imply that I know any more
     about that assassination than anyone else does."
     Nixon's tenseness at this moment was striking.
     Since then, I have been suspicious that Nixon might have
     knowledge, if not some involvement in the assassination.

     What ought to be examined is a tape of that press
     conference so that perhaps a scientific voice analysis
     can be done to indicate, albeit not to prove, that Nixon
     was lying about his lack of knowledge of any unreported
     evidence surrounding the assassination of John Kennedy.

     If enough people wish to collaborate on such a project,
     we may be able to finance the purchase of the tape and the
     voice analysis with small cost to everyone involved.
     Please send me e-mail if you are interested.

         John DiNardo
         [e-mail]   or  jad@att!ckuxb

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

      If you agree that this story deserves broad public attention, please
      assist in disseminating it by posting it to other bulletin boards,
      and by posting hardcopies in public places, both on and off campus.
      As evidence accrues concerning the corporate mass media's thirty-year
      cover-up of the corporate CIA's coup d'etat against the People of
      the United States, the necessity of citizen reportage becomes
      ever more striking.

      John DiNardo