home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
- From: jad@ckuxb.att.com (John A Dinardo)
- Subject: Part III, PACIFICA RADIO Investigates the Murder of President Kennedy
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.025822.16141@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Originator: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Keywords: researchers' revelations about the assassination of President Kennedy
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
- Distribution: na
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 02:58:22 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 157
-
- I made the following transcript from a tape recording
- of a broadcast by Pacifica Radio station
- WBAI-FM (99.5)
- 505 Eighth Ave., 19th Fl.
- New York, NY 10018 (212) 279-0707
-
- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
- (continuation)
- GARY NULL:
- Now, just today -- just less than an hour ago -- the American
- Medical Association gave it's official position on the Kennedy
- assassination, and a Doctor George Lundberg, the editor of the
- Journal of the American Medical Association and Editor-in-Chief
- of Scientific Publications of JAMA, read their position paper,
- and I'll just quote something from it. Later in the show we're
- going to come back to this, because we have a part of the press
- conference recorded by WBAI. It says:
-
- "The recent Crenshaw book"
- (and we had Dr. Crenshaw on the show)
- "is a sad fabrication based upon unsubstantiated allegations. The best
- explanation for the motivations of myriad conspiracy theorists are
- paranoia, the desire for personal recognition, public visibility and profit.
-
- Anyhow, it says that this is all nonsense. There was no
- conspiracy; that the Warren Commission was right. And THAT was
- the press conference. We'll get more on the press conference, but
- I just want you to know that finally JAMA (and I don't know why
- JAMA would be sticking it's nose into something that it knows
- nothing about, to begin with) came out and felt the need to hold
- a press conference to say that the Warren Commission was right.
- Everyone (they say) in the field writing books, doing broadcasts,
- or offering information to the public, must be doing it for profit,
- recognition or some other [personal] motive.
-
- JIM MARRS:
- I've got news for them. Talk to anybody who has known me and
- they'll tell you that I've been making the same criticisms since
- the early `70s, and I certainly never made any money. In fact,
- people ....
-
- GARY NULL:
- Jim, let me ask you something. Have you ever been found guilty, in
- an extended trial, of restraint of trade, monopolistic practices,
- and, if so, was that conviction upheld all the way clear up to
- all the different appeals courts, and now the conviction is
- final?
-
- JIM MARRS:
- Not me.
-
- GARY NULL:
- Well that has happened to the American Medical Association. So,
- when the AMA has the audacity to come onto a press conference --
- with the muddled background that they have for having been caught
- engaging in the restraint of trade and in monopolistic practices
- -- claiming that others have ulterior motives, I think it's
- absolutely absurd.
-
- JIM MARRS:
- Anybody who knows anything knows that the AMA is a FIRM supporter
- of the status quo, and that it has been highly political for
- years. And I would ascribe political motives to almost anything
- that they do. The point that I want to make here is -- if my
- understanding is correct -- if they are simply quoting from the
- two autopsy doctors who worked on President Kennedy, well then,
- this is just an affirmation [of that autopsy]. Of course, those
- doctors are going to say the same things they said in 1963 and
- 1964, and it's going to support the Warren Commission's
- contention. But this is a diversion. This is a red herring. This
- is not the issue. The issue is that what the autopsy doctors saw
- was not the same as what the doctors saw [at Parkland Hospital]
- in Dallas. And there is a very DEEP discrepancy between the
- wounds as viewed in Dallas .... I just quoted you all these
- people who said that there was a large hole in the back of his
- head. This was not seen at the autopsy -- or not reported. So
- we've got some real discrepancies here, and this particular
- little news conference and their pronouncements are simply
- skirting the issue.
-
- GARY NULL:
- Okay, Jim, I want you to hold on because we're going to introduce
- some new evidence and a new individual to our conference here.
- He is Harrison Edward Livingstone, the author of HIGH TREASON II.
- Welcome to our program, Mr. Livingstone.
-
- HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
- Thanks for inviting me.
-
- GARY NULL:
- I would like to go straight to some of the most important issues,
- and if you would, please give us the research that you have
- uncovered on these. First, I would like to have you review, from
- your perspective, the eyewitness descriptions of Kennedy's real
- wounds.
-
- HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
- Well, as you know, I've been able to interview almost every
- living medical witness. I did not talk to Doctor Clark, although
- he gave me certain answers through his secretary, twelve years
- ago. I have talked to Doctor Humes, but I can't say that anything
- was productive there, even after as much as an hour of talk.
- But, other than that, my book presents the most complete history
- of what these doctors are saying today, and put in perspective of
- what they said and wrote in 1963. No other book or writer or
- researcher has achiveved this.
-
- GARY NULL:
- We're not here to promote your book, as such. We're here for you
- to please share your information with us. So if you could, please
- go right to the information. Would you talk about the evidence of
- forgery and retouching of the autopsy photographs and X-rays?
-
- HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
- [initial words were drowned out by Gary Null's voice]
- .... doctors and the two autopsies. And the point being that they
- are trying to head off at the pass the research that I have just
- published, and for no other reason; also [they're targeting] Doctor
- Crenshaw's book and his statements. They made a number of totally
- false statements at this press conference. For instance, that
- Crenshaw (they quoted other doctors, and this is an example of how
- they cooked their article by the American Medical Association) ....
- that Crenshaw was not present at the autopsy -- when if you go and
- read in Volume Six of the Warren Commission books, he is mentioned
- by almost every doctor as having been there. And he was certainly
- in a position to observe the wounds and to see what was going on.
- And it doesn't take anybody more than an idiot to know that a
- bullet is either an entry hole through the skin of the neck, or
- it's an exit, because, if it's coming out, it's going to make
- quite a tear. And anybody, basically, would see the difference.
- I was pretty stunned, as you probably know, because I was at this
- press conference today. You ask: Why is JAMA [the Journal of the
- American Medical Association] doing this at this time, and I'm
- just telling you there is only one reason why they're doing it.
- It's because the whole cover-up perpetrated by the Government in
- this case is directly threatened by the research that I have done
- and by my making it possible for Crenshaw and the other doctors
- to come forward.
-
- GARY NULL:
- Alright. Would you give us some link between Richard Nixon's men
- and John Kennedy's killers that ties the assassination directly
- to Watergate? And could you please give us the facts?
- (to be continued)
- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-
- If you agree that this story deserves broad public attention,
- please assist in disseminating it by posting it to other networks,
- and by posting hardcopies in public places, both on and off campus.
- As evidence accrues concerning the corporate mass media's thirty
- year cover-up of the corporate CIA's coup d'etat against the
- People of the United States, the necessity of citizen reportage
- becomes ever more striking.
-
- John DiNardo
-
-
-