home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!daemon
- From: harelb@math.cornell.edu (misc.activism.progressive co-moderator)
- Subject: OCAW Pres.: RETRAIN FOR WHAT? WORKER SUPERFUND'S THE ANSWER
- Message-ID: <1992Sep4.220822.15616@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism,alt.politics.elections
- Originator: daemon@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: misc.activism.progressive on UseNet ; ACTIV-L@UMCVMB
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 22:08:22 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 92
-
- DENVER, Sept. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- President Robert E. Wages of the
- Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union (OCAW) today issued
- the following Labor Day statement:
-
-
- "If we can have a superfund to remove toxic dirt, paid for by the
- corporations responsible, why can't we have a Superfund for
- Workers paid for by the corporations who close their plants
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- "NAFTA is not about free trade or any other kind of trade. NAFTA
- is about driving our standards -- wage standards, worker safety
- standards, environmental standards, social benefit standards,
- public health standards -- down to the levels of Third World
- countries [...] [and] guaranteeing to corporations the unlimited
- right to ruthlessly exploit the hemisphere's poorest peoples.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- [Via misc.activism.progressive from LaborNet's labor.newsline]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- [Inquiries by email, please, to harelb@math.cornell.edu, for more
- information about PeaceNet/EcoNet or LaborNet, or about MAP,
- misc.activism.progressive]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Topic 267 Retraining and Worker Superfund
- ocaw Labor News & Notes 9:58 am Sep 4, 1992
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- ==================================================================
- OCAW PRESIDENT: RETRAIN FOR WHAT? WORKER SUPERFUND'S THE ANSWER
- ==================================================================
- DATE: September 4, 1992
-
- DENVER, Sept. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- President Robert E. Wages of the
- Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union (OCAW) today issued
- the following Labor Day statement:
-
- Retrain for what? Recent campaign promises by George Bush and Bill
- Clinton about the retraining of displaced workers leave me wondering
- what they can possibly be talking about. What are they going to teach
- them to do? Stand in unemployment lines and food lines? Give them
- speech lessons so they can tell their families that there's no future in
- store? Train them to survive without a roof over their heads? With no
- jobs to retrain for, what's the point?
-
- For 12 years, the Republicans have pursued a devastating, scorched-
- earth economic policy that has ravaged jobs, people and industries in
- this country beyond repair. Now, with the North American Free Trade Act
- (NAFTA), they, along with plenty of help from the Democrats, want to
- finish us off.
-
- NAFTA is not about free trade or any other kind of trade. NAFTA is
- about driving our standards -- wage standards, worker safety standards,
- environmental standards, social benefit standards, public health
- standards -- down to the levels of Third World countries. In short,
- it's about selling off our economic security and quality of life by
- guaranteeing to corporations the unlimited right to ruthlessly exploit
- the hemisphere's poorest peoples.
-
- When workers lose their jobs and there are no other jobs to be had,
- except for unskilled minimum or sub-minimum wage jobs, then there's only
- one possible outcome -- impoverishment. No amount of training or
- retraining will make a difference in that situation. It's time to
- consider a new approach.
-
- The approach our union has mapped out is based on the fundamental
- premise that those who are responsible for the problem should be the
- ones to fix it. Our models -- concepts already accepted by our society
- -- are the Toxic Waste Superfund and the post-World War II G.I. Bill of
- Rights. If we can have a superfund to remove toxic dirt, paid for by
- the corporations responsible, why can't we have a Superfund for Workers
- paid for by the corporations who close their plants -- for whatever
- reason -- and lay them off? Why can't we treat this nation's workers as
- well as we treat dirt?
-
- If we as a nation could pave the way for the transition to a
- peacetime economy by paying our veterans to attend college, why can't we
- do it again for our worker veterans who have been through the industrial
- wars of the 1980s and '90s? In response to the argument that we can't
- afford it, I ask: how is it that we can mobilize capital for the massive
- S&L bailout, or for the waging of wars? We can do just about anything
- when it's acceptable to those with wealth and power.
-
- We need to redefine the whole concept of what work is. Developing
- people's conceptual skills is far more important than merely training
- them to perform certain job-related operations, because they will learn
- to adapt to change. If people are free to pursue education in whatever
- field they choose, it not only liberates and empowers them personally;
- it also elevates society to new levels driven by the creativity
- unleashed with a dynamic, well-educated workforce.
-
- In other words our society, in its own self interest, should pay its
- members to become educated, cultured citizens of the world.
-
-