home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!bu.edu!decwrl!pa.dec.com!parc.xerox.com!leisner
- From: leisner@annapurna.pa.dec.com (Marty Leisner)
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
- Subject: Unix Review Native-code C++ compilers
- Message-ID: <9209101910.AA06195@annapurna.wbst147.xerox.com>
- Date: 10 Sep 92 19:10:11 GMT
- Reply-To: leisner.henr801c@xerox.com
- Organization: Xerox
- Lines: 18
- X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA18168; Thu, 10 Sep 92 12:11:19 -0700
- X-Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA02115; Thu, 10 Sep 92 12:11:18 -0700
- X-Received: from zombi ([13.1.189.45]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <15671>; Thu, 10 Sep 1992 12:10:54 PDT
- X-Received: from annapurna.wbst147.xerox.com ([13.1.157.12]) by zombi (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA00420; Thu, 10 Sep 92 15:10:50 EDT
- X-Received: by annapurna.wbst147.xerox.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA06195; Thu, 10 Sep 92 15:10:11 EDT
- X-To: editor@ureview.com,
-
- X- gnu.misc.discuss.usenet%decwrl.dec.com@eso.mc.xerox.com
- X-Cc: leisner@eso.mc.xerox.com
-
-
- Unix Review neglected to mention g++ in their native code C++ compilers.
-
- The Review is in the October, 1992 issue.
-
- It mentions Zortech C++, TauMetric C++ and Liant C++...
-
- It didn't recommend any of them, it says the decision will generally be made on the
- basis of price.
-
- I think if you are doing serious programming, price is irrelevant, your time is.
-
- Marty leisner.henr801c@xerox.com
- Member of the League for Programming Freedom
- Give me source or waste my time..
-