home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
- Path: sparky!uunet!nwnexus!Celestial.COM!bill
- From: bill@Celestial.COM (Bill Campbell)
- Subject: Re: Mailer replacement for Xenix
- Organization: Celestial Software, Mercer Island, WA
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 16:14:47 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Sep14.161447.25577@Celestial.COM>
- References: <1992Sep10.114323.587@pubnet.com> <11745@ember.UUCP> <1992Sep13.020609.5680@unx.ucc.okstate.edu> <1992Sep13.233934.19638@golem.uucp>
- Lines: 32
-
- In <1992Sep13.233934.19638@golem.uucp> davidf@golem.uucp (David J. Fiander) writes:
-
- :According to terry@unx.ucc.okstate.edu (Terry J. Klarich):
- :>
- :>I run a xenix 2.3.3 system at home. I have used mmdf for about 2 years on my
- :>machine. I ftped the sources and got it up and running without trouble. mmdf
- :>and mh makes for a nice mail system.
- :>
-
- :They certainly do! This is exactly what I'm running. I like
- :MMDF because it is easy to understand and modify the
- :configuration, and it places less of a load on my tiny machine
-
- Easy to understand for you maybe, but you've been deeply involved
- with mmdf for several years now. I went to your seminar on mmdf
- at SCO Forum '91 and didn't understand much more after 1.5
- hours of seminar than I did when I went in :-). I would like to
- see something that explains mmdf for the smail 2.5 user, perhaps
- an O'Reilly book.
-
- :than sendmail or smail do. The biggest advantage the monlithic
- :mailers have over MMDF is the fact that they take less disk
- :space.
-
- Sounds like good arguments to me.
-
- Bill
- --
- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software
- UUCP: ...!thebes!camco!bill 6641 East Mercer Way
- uunet!camco!bill Mercer Island, WA 98040; (206) 947-5591
- SPEED COSTS MONEY -- HOW FAST DO YOU WANT TO GO?
-