home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!bagate!cbmvax!devon!dastari!dastari!hermit
- From: hermit@dastari.uucp (Mark Buda)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
- Subject: Re: Xenix considered harmful (was Re: SCO support - a success story)
- Message-ID: <HERMIT.92Sep9143956@dastari.uucp>
- Date: 9 Sep 92 19:39:56 GMT
- References: <9209061050.AA05570@dynamix.com> <Bu6Bpp.AG8@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us>
- Sender: hermit@dastari.uucp (Mark Buda)
- Reply-To: hermit%dastari.uucp@devon.lns.pa.us
- Organization: Avalon Computing
- Lines: 14
- In-Reply-To: mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us's message of Sun, 6 Sep 1992 20: 32:11 GMT
-
- In article <Bu6Bpp.AG8@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes:
- >Sure, you *can* get domain-based e-mail running on a Xenix system, but
- >it's an unbelievable amount of trouble to rip out the Xenix e-mail
- >system and replace it with your own.
-
- No, it isn't. Grab sendmail and mush, compile, replace. Granted,
- sendmail 5.61 needs a whack on the head or two to work under Xenix,
- but it works.
-
- And you only need to whack it that one time.
- --
- Mark Buda
-
- I get my monkeys for nothing and my chimps for free.
-