home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: David.Gursky@p394.f70.n109.z1.fidonet.org (David Gursky)
- Sender: Uucp@blkcat.UUCP
- Path: sparky!uunet!blkcat!Uucp
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Subject: Spreadsheets (was Mesa vs. Appsoft)
- Message-ID: <716000430.F00004@blkcat.UUCP>
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1992 21:05:15 -0500
- Lines: 21
-
- I'll throw my two cents in to this debate. The one thing missing from
- everyone's spreadsheet application is compatibility with Excel*. Yes, it's very
- nice that everyone can read and write SYLK and 1-2-3 formats, but SYLK and 1-2-3
- are not the dominant format for spreadsheets anymore, Excel is. So why is this
- important? Because organizations have gone ahead and built "Mission-Critical"
- applications using spreadsheets (notably Excel), they shy away from a new
- product that forces them to re-engineer their application, and justifiably so.
-
- Now this is not to say that the company that is first to bring an Excel
- compatible spreadsheet to market is going to make a small fortune and capture
- the lion's share of the NeXT spreadsheet market for years to come, and become a
- major component in the suite of applications that sells thousands of NeXTs
- (don't think this is possible? Look at how memory sales increased after Apple
- released Hypercard, or how laser printer sales increased with the advent of
- mature desktop publishing applications), but if any of the four spreadsheet
- vendors out their (Appsoft, Athena, Informix, or Lotus) expects to achieve that
- goal, Excel compatibility is must be a key piece to that puzzle.
-
- * What is Excel compatibility? It is the ability to interpret correctly a
- complete set of Excel features in an Excel spreadsheet, including references to
- Macros, external documents (i.e. charts), formulas, the whole shebang.
-