home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!att-out!rutgers!rochester!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!fj05+
- From: fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu (Faisal Nameer Jawdat)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
- Subject: Re: RE-Win/NT
- Message-ID: <sef3=su00WB5EwRYIK@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: 8 Sep 92 04:58:32 GMT
- References: <715860088.F00001@blkcat.UUCP>
- <Bu7LH9.4ML@acsu.buffalo.edu>
- <keev_bC00WB78Xif8m@andrew.cmu.edu>
- <0ef1s4200UhWI4gndI@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Organization: Sophomore, Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
- Lines: 10
- In-Reply-To: <0ef1s4200UhWI4gndI@andrew.cmu.edu>
-
- Robert Agustin
- >-Full compatibility with MS-DOS and Windows applications on both Intel
- > and MIPS based systems
-
- NT isn't supposed to support full DOS compatibility
-
- one other note - no matter what MS says, their 'promise' to 'keep
- promise' ratio is ridiculously low, so it's really to early to predict
- any sort of details on what NT will do and what it will run on - just
- generally what it will be is visible
-