home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsc!cbfsb!cbnewsb.cb.att.com!mbb
- From: mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant)
- Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.034115.21253@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
- Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com
- Organization: AT&T
- References: <1992Sep10.182949.18662@mksol.dseg.ti.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 03:41:15 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- From article <1992Sep10.182949.18662@mksol.dseg.ti.com>, by mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539):
- > In <1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant) writes:
- >>From article <1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM>, by gregp@bluemtn.COM (Greg Philmon):
- >>> ....
- >>> BC includes more powerful, standalone tools for developing, such as the
- >>> excellent Turbo Debugger, profiler, etc. BC is an optimizing compiler,
- >>> TC is not.
- >
- >>I'm confused. Maybe that only applies to the current release. I bought
- >>a used copy of Turbo C++ 1.0 which includes debugger, profiles, and
- >>assembler, and I think it has optimization in the compiler....
- >
- > Yes, you are confused. Note the use of the phrase "stand-alone"
- > above. He's not talking about debugging from inside the IDE. Also,
- > Turbo C++ does indeed have SOME optimization -- BCC++ has a lot more.
-
- Not that confused. I've never used it, but I have a User's Guide for
- a standalone Turbo Debugger with its own UI. Don't knock the Turbo
- product any more than it deserves.
-
- Marty
- marty@hoqaa.att.com hoqaa!marty
- Martin B. Brilliant (Winnertech Corporation)
-