home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20 / NN_1992_20.iso / spool / comp / sys / ibm / pc / misc / 12433 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-09-09  |  1011 b   |  27 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!cicero.spc.uchicago.edu!spcberto
  3. From: spcberto@cicero.spc.uchicago.edu (Robert Osterlund)
  4. Subject: Re: Stacker vs. SuperStor
  5. Message-ID: <1992Sep9.213853.28528@midway.uchicago.edu>
  6. Keywords: Data Compression
  7. Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
  8. Organization: U of Chicago, SSPPCC
  9. References: <BuA1Eu.480@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
  10. Distribution: usa
  11. Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 21:38:53 GMT
  12. Lines: 13
  13.  
  14. In article <BuA1Eu.480@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> ezachris@cochiti.ucs.indiana.edu writes:
  15. >
  16. >I (too) am running out of diskspace and Stacker and SuperStor came to  
  17. >mind. SuperStor will give you compressed floppies, which Stacker won't.
  18. >
  19. No, Stacker WILL compress your floppies, but you need Stacker to use them.
  20. I believe SuperStor creates compressed floppies that others (who don't
  21. have SuperStor) can read, however.
  22.  
  23. Bob Osterlund
  24. berto@clio.spc.uchicago.edu
  25. SSPPCC--University of Chicago
  26.  
  27.