home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20 / NN_1992_20.iso / spool / comp / sys / ibm / pc / misc / 12387 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-09-08  |  761 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!news
  2. From: ezachris@cochiti.ucs.indiana.edu
  3. Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
  4. Subject: Stacker vs. SuperStor
  5. Keywords: Data Compression
  6. Message-ID: <BuA1Eu.480@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
  7. Date: 8 Sep 92 20:40:05 GMT
  8. Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
  9. Distribution: usa
  10. Organization: Indiana University
  11. Lines: 13
  12. Nntp-Posting-Host: cochiti.ucs.indiana.edu
  13.  
  14.  
  15. I (too) am running out of diskspace and Stacker and SuperStor came to  
  16. mind. SuperStor will give you compressed floppies, which Stacker won't.
  17.  
  18. Which is better?
  19. Any difference in performance (compression ration/speed)?
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23. Thanks in advance.
  24.  
  25. E. Zachrisen
  26. ezachris@cherokee.ucs.indiana.edu
  27.