home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!natimuk.acci.com.au!william
- From: william@natimuk.acci.com.au (William Lo)
- Subject: Re: 15" monitors
- Message-ID: <9225314.9937@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
- Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU
- Organization: IBM Australia/ACCI
- References: <dxryk-m@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 04:26:49 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <dxryk-m@rpi.edu> gilem@aix02.ecs.rpi.edu (Michael R. Gile) writes:
- >After looking around for a machine for a few weeks now, I have
- >decided that I will probably not have the money to buy a 17"
- >monitor, because all the decent ones cost >$1k. Does anyone
- >have a suggestion for the best 15" monitor available. I would
- >prefer flat screen, and 70+ Hz refresh at 1024x768. As far
- >as quality is concerned, I would like a crisp image, and the
- >largest screen size possible. has anyone ever seen the V6FS,
- >it looks promising...
- >
- >thanks
- >gilem@rpi.edu
- >
-
- An NEC 4FG is all that you're looking for(except it doesn't support
- 72+ hz refresh rates - the max. is 70). But other features
- above-mentioned it has all. Should be the best 15" around. Another
- one could be the Viewsonic 6F 15" which however I haven't seen.
-
- I've recently bought a MAG MX14 trinitron which is a pleasant baby,
- too. Supports very fast refresh rates. And can do 1280x1024 at 64hz
- (NI) - that's quite good for a tiny 14"! Also has got an LCD displaying
- vga mode information(digitally) all the way. BTW, it's $100(A$) less
- expensive(but still expensive) than the NEC 15". Definitely worth
- considering!
-
- ---Cheers,
- Bill
-