In article <olsen.2183@sourcery.mxm.sub.org> olsen@sourcery.mxm.sub.org (Olaf Barthel) writes:
>
> If I remember correctly, the program is still in its very early
>stages (v0.85 or so). You can't expect any program to perform reliably before
>going through a number of revisions.
>
> How comes that it appears to you to look like `term'? Does it
>crash quite as often? ;-)
G'day dude,
Yeah thats what I've been trying to tell people all over the Net!That version of X-Comm is BETA! Thats why it crashes a HELL of alot. thse days however, a guru is a very rare occurence. We're putting in the final things now. Finishing things off. By the way, X-Comm does have a slight amount of code from 'term' in it (You did say that was ok in the docs didn't you?), and I will certainly be giving you credit in the final release. It's just alot easier if someone else has already written the routine isn't i
t :-). Most of it is modified beyond recognition now. I must say that I admire you greatly for writing some of the most readable routines I've ever seen. You're the only person I have seen that has realised that capital letters in identified LOOKS GOOD! Everyone else doesn't seem to know where the SHIFT key on the keyboard is :-). Anyway, good luck with the bug fix. I know exaclty how you feel. It gives me the SH*TS when things go badly wrong. It'll be my turn soon :-)
--
--
Well I guess I'd better say something witty...
--
We were young and our happiness dazzled us with its strength.
