home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!gatech!psuvax1!uxa.ecn.bgu.edu!xmas
- From: xmas@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Mark A. Stevens)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
- Subject: Re: More questions on WinQVT/net
- Message-ID: <1992Sep15.134431.28056@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu>
- Date: 15 Sep 92 13:44:31 GMT
- References: <14SEP199217320831@elroy.uh.edu>
- Organization: Educational Computing Network
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <14SEP199217320831@elroy.uh.edu> elee969@elroy.uh.edu (Brown, William J.) writes:
- >Ok, I'm zeroing in for the kill on WinQVT, however I still have a few more
- >questions. Basically, is there any fine-tuning I need to do to the config
- >file that will speed up things a bit? For instance, I've noticed that when
- >I ftp something off of the pc, the transfer time seems extremely long compared
- >to ftp'ing from say a vax or unix box, not to mention the fact that the pc
- >slows to a crawl during the transfer. Could it be a problem with the ethernet
- >connection, since we've noticed that a Next hooked up to the same ethernet line
- >seems a bit sluggish at times also. Or is this just symptomatic of trying to
- >ftp off of a dos box? Your help is appreciated.
-
- I've used WinQVT/Net with ethernet and token ring. It's FTP transfer
- rate is slower than say Clarkson's CUTCP/CUTE FTP transfer rate. The
- probable (IMHO) main difference is Windows. Though it is possible
- WinQVT/Net is not as efficient as it could be.
- --
- Mark A. Stevens Phone: 708-534-0200
- Systems Programmer Internet: xmas@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
- Educational Computing Network BITNET: XMAS@ECNUXA.BITNET
- Board of Governors Universities VMSHARE: ECE/MARK
-