home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!jupiter!billp
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: Can you access a virtual console directly?
- Message-ID: <1992Sep15.220517.9988@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
- From: billp@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu (Bill Parquet)
- Date: 15 Sep 92 22:05:17 EST
- References: <1992Sep15.212642.26628@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu
- Lines: 25
-
- wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Lars Wirzenius) writes:
- : >How about if the kernel had some special services that would make it
- : >easy and portable (within Linuces) to use the virtual consoles without
- : >termcap? I mean something like this:
- :
- : You solution has serious problems. Among other things, it assumes that
- : the video memory is laid out in a special way. Not everybody uses the
- : same kind of hardware you do. If you use termcap, you just don't have
- : to worry about it.
-
- It might be helpful if there was some sort of library for screen mainten-
- ance. Instead of directly manipulating the screen, it would translate
- function calls into termcap codes. Maybe something like borlands turbo-
- vision, only not nearly so elaborate.
-
- Something like that would keep the new programmers happy, and still keep
- the programs fairly portable. If the api was extensive enough, special
- versions could be made vt100, MGR, X11 (although that might be spreading
- out a little thin), but just being able to recompile the app with a
- different library and being able to take advantage of a completely different
- interface.
-
- (If I could clone myself maybe 3 or 4 times, I would probably have enough
- time to program all my ideas!)
-
-