home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!tivoli!todd
- From: todd@palomar.tivoli.com
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
- Subject: Scheme or TCL?
- Message-ID: <TODD.92Sep3171011@palomar.tivoli.com>
- Date: 3 Sep 92 08:10:11 GMT
- Sender: news@tivoli.UUCP
- Distribution: comp
- Organization: TIVOLI Systems, Inc.
- Lines: 20
-
-
- I'd like some help from those more experienced with Scheme than I am.
- I need a interpretable language that can be used for a portion of our
- application development. Currently, there are a number of people in
- my company playing with TCL and TK. I am more interested in using
- Scheme, perhaps the Siod or Elk implementations. Unfortunately, some
- here are prejudiced against anything that looks like Lisp. (It
- probably comes from working in poor Lisp environments in school.) Are
- there any concrete points that can be raised in favor of Scheme over
- TCL (or vice versa)?
-
-
- --
-
- Todd
- --
- Todd Smith TIVOLI Systems, Inc.
- todd@tivoli.com 6034 West Courtyard Dr.
- Suite 210
- (512) 794-9070 [794-0623 fax] Austin, TX 78730
-