home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.edu
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!marlin.jcu.edu.au!coral.cs.jcu.edu.au!farrell
- From: farrell@coral.cs.jcu.edu.au (John Farrell)
- Subject: Re: Are computer "scientists" really scientists? (was: Are programmers Computer Scientists?)
- Message-ID: <farrell.715940729@coral.cs.jcu.edu.au>
- Sender: news@marlin.jcu.edu.au (USENET News System)
- Organization: James Cook University
- References: <1992Sep3.174548.29169@ulowell.ulowell.edu> <Sep03.194343.67982@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> <2250@h.cs.wvu.wvnet.edu> <1992Sep4.172303.2572@newshost.lanl.gov> <1992Sep4.173115.3743@newshost.lanl.gov> <1992Sep8.045156.6935@m.cs.uiuc.edu>
- Date: 8 Sep 92 08:25:29 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In <1992Sep8.045156.6935@m.cs.uiuc.edu> gillies@m.cs.uiuc.edu (Don Gillies) writes:
- >In my opinion, the core of the C.S. discipline is concerned with
- >speeding up computers.
-
- >The alternate core of C.S. is concerned with making computers easier
- >to use. This covers everything user interface to language design to
- >O/S research to network design, and so on.
-
- I don't agree entirely with either view. Neither fast nor easy to use
- computers are much use if you've got bugs in your program. I suggest that
- computer science is just as much about finding a way to write correct programs
- despite human failings, as anything else. There are certainly enormous
- economic benefits to be had if you can be sure that your program is correct!
-
- John
-