home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!IRLEARN.UCD.IE!RCONROY
- Message-ID: <STAT-L%92091004411572@VM1.MCGILL.CA>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.stat-l
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 09:32:49 GMT
- Sender: "STATISTICAL CONSULTING" <STAT-L@MCGILL1.BITNET>
- From: Ronan M Conroy <RCONROY@IRLEARN.UCD.IE>
- Subject: Blue + sad = ?
- Lines: 11
-
- Francis Dane maintains that adding "I'm blue" to "I'm sad" will
- be valid if the two are correlated. But what if all those who say
- they're blue are the self-same people who say they're sad? This
- means that one symptom now counts for two points on the scale.
- Clearly this violates one rule of measurement, viz: that all objects
- with the different labels are different things. Adding together
- items may produce pseudo-variation if the items are of the
- same 'degree of difficulty' - very concordant, in a word (two words,
- actually - well, ten, if you count the digression).
-
- ronan
-