home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #19 / NN_1992_19.iso / spool / vmsnet / networks / tcpip / multinet / 2093 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-09-03  |  1.0 KB  |  30 lines
  1. X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!network.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!tgv.com!info-multinet
  3. Date: 04 SEP 92 03:28:42 GMT
  4. Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
  5. X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
  6. X-RFC822-From: "David Scott Cunningham, TRIUMF, 604 222-1047"
  7. From: "David Scott Cunningham, TRIUMF, 604 222-1047"
  8. Message-ID: <00960143.4B0A4800.22503@erich.triumf.ca>
  9. Subject: decwindows, multinet, and ucx
  10. Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
  11. Nntp-Posting-Host: Mvb.Saic.Com
  12. Lines: 16
  13.  
  14. Hello,
  15.  
  16. Is there some trick to using multinet as the ip transport on a cluster
  17. node which does not have ucx installed?  In the log file ucx$server_0_error.log
  18. it says:
  19.  
  20. %DECW-W-ATT_FAIL, failed to attach transport TCPIP
  21. -SYSTEM-W-NOSUCHDEV, no such device available
  22.  
  23. and the people from DEC are saying that this occurs if one does not have
  24. UCX installed on a machine, regardless of whther or not it is being used.
  25. Is this true?
  26.  
  27. Dave
  28.  
  29. 
  30.