home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!sdd.hp.com!nigel.msen.com!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!arizona.edu!mvb.saic.com!macro32
- From: DWING@UH01.Colorado.EDU (Dan Wing)
- Newsgroups: vmsnet.internals
- Subject: Re: PATCH on ALPHA ?
- Message-ID: <01GOB2U7BRMQ0000M0@VAXF.COLORADO.EDU>
- Date: 2 Sep 92 17:36:24 GMT
- Organization: Macro32<==>Vmsnet.Internals Gateway
- Lines: 32
- X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List
-
- Ed Heinrich, HEINRICH@yvax.byu.EDU, writes:
-
- [...]
-
- >I have to agree w/ both Bruce and Hunter. For software companies that
- >have large customer bases PATCH is invaluable.
-
- DEC has a large customer base!
-
- >In addition, many system managers WILL apply a
- >patch if they are told it fixes a potential crash-related bug, they
- >may not, however, rush to do a full installation if you send them a
- >patched distribution kit. (I know of some shops that only schedule
- >product upgrades during Christmas week when the plant is closed, but
- >they will apply a PATCH when they receive it).
-
- It is difficult to explain to management why you didn't apply a patch that
- would prevent a crash because you feared the patch could cause a crash!
-
- DEC has sent me a good 3-4 patches for LATmaster and LATSYM on VMS V5.4-x
- and V5.5. These were patches to existing code, not new images. The
- problems were severe enough to warrent installing the fixes immediately.
-
- >The question of use vs. abuse of PATCH needs to be managed. Companies
- >need to insure that PATCHES are reflected in source code changes as
- >soon as the patches are cut to avoid issuing subsequent releases with the
- >same bugs.
-
- That has happened here.
-
- -Dan Wing, DWING@UH01.Colorado.EDU or WING_D@UCOLMCC.BITNET (DGW11)
- Systems Programmer, University Hospital, Denver
-