home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!dcrosgr
- From: dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu
- Newsgroups: talk.rape
- Subject: Re: Unnecessary hostility in talk.rape
- Message-ID: <1992Aug29.022431.9766@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
- Date: 29 Aug 92 02:24:31 EST
- References: <9208251917.AA03130@ros6.gsfc.nasa.gov> <1992Aug27.095705.9728@uoft02.utoledo.edu> <14363@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
- Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <14363@auspex-gw.auspex.com>, bae@Auspex.COM (Brian Ehrmantraut) writes:
- > In article <1992Aug27.095705.9728@uoft02.utoledo.edu>, dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
- >> In article <14321@auspex-gw.auspex.com>, bae@Auspex.COM (Brian Ehrmantraut) writes:
- >>> Gee, DC, with the clues Andy provided, I managed to find the relevant
- >>> sections of California law, and it only took about five minutes. I didn't
- >>> even have to leave my office. Surely you, with all of your supposed legal
- >>> expertise, could do as well...
- >>>
- >>> Then again, perhaps you simply don't know what you are talking about.
- >>
- >> How do you know you found the same code Andy is referring to?
- >
- > Because the statutes in question are obvious to even the most casual
- > reader. I'll quote the text of part of one of them here:
- >
- > "No person shall purchase, possess or use any
- > tear gas weapon which expels a projectile, or
- > which expels the tear gas by any method other
- > than an aerosol spray, or which is of a type,
- > or size of container, other than authorized by
- > regulation of the Department of Justice."
- >
-
- Yes or no Andy, is this the code you are referring to?
-
- (Lock yourself in and let the fun begin, if you got the balls.)
-
- DC
-
-
-
-