home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: A new orbiter? (dont think so--was Re: National Space Plane)
- Message-ID: <BtGory.EwA@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 00:16:45 GMT
- References: <l9025rINN1a2@west.west.sun.com> <1992Aug18.134803.1800@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <kdawson.14@AFIT.AF.MIL> <1992Aug19.102235.14319@athena.mit.edu>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <1992Aug19.102235.14319@athena.mit.edu> cid@athena.mit.edu (Derek H Cedillo) writes:
- >It seemed [the X-30's] main cargo would be passengers, or upper atmosphere
- >studying equip. Watch out concorde :)
-
- I'm only going to say this once more:
-
- The X-30 is planned as a flight-research aircraft, like the X-15.
-
- Apart from instrumentation, it will have no payload. None. Zero.
-
- It will carry a crew of two, and no passengers. None. Zero.
-
- It is most unlikely that more than two will be built.
-
- It will never be "operational" in any realistic sense of the word.
-
- It will be very expensive to run and will not fly often.
-
- It will not replace the shuttle or anything else.
-
- *If* the X-30 is built, and *if* it is highly successful, and *if* funding
- can be found, then ten or fifteen years after it first flies, derivatives
- might be hauling useful payloads into space. Maybe.
-
- Right now, the way to bet is that it will never be built, because it costs
- too much and nobody needs it very badly.
- --
- There is nothing wrong with making | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- mistakes, but... make *new* ones. -D.Sim| henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-