home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!news
- From: bwise@hemlock.mitre.org (Barry Wise)
- Subject: Re: Detectors
- Message-ID: <1992Aug27.131334.21514@linus.mitre.org>
- Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hemlock.mitre.org
- Organization: The MITRE Corporation
- References: <920826132615.20202e47@FNALD.FNAL.GOV>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 13:13:34 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <920826132615.20202e47@FNALD.FNAL.GOV> ames!FNALD.FNAL.GOV!DROEGE
- writes:
- > Barry Wise asks about point 8. As noted at the time, Jennifer turned on the
- > heat between point 7 and point 8. That is she activated the controll that
- > caused the furnace to perform a heating cycle.
-
- Yes I recognized that possibility based upon your discussion. But the real
- question I had was why the same anomaly happened after about the same length of
- running time (~1 week) in the first (pseudo Ying) run. I wouldn't have
- mentioned it if I'd only seen the one occurence. As I said, it could well be
- an environmental effect due to the weekly activities going on in your house,
- but it seemed awfully suspicious to me (without having all the facts) that it
- would repeat the same way if it was a random event. Did Jennifer turn on the
- heat at point ten in the first run?
-
- If someone has the data from the PF or Takahashi runs is there a jump at about
- 1 week into the run?
-
- --
- Barry Wise
- (bwise@hemlock.mitre.org)
-
-