home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!ajk.tele.fi!funic!nokia.fi!tnclus.tele.nokia.fi!hporopudas
- From: hporopudas@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi
- Subject: Re: Proof of God's Existence
- Message-ID: <1992Sep4.182046.1@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi>
- Lines: 23
- Sender: usenet@noknic.nokia.fi (USENET at noknic)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: tne02.tele.nokia.fi
- Organization: Nokia Telecommunications.
- References: <ARA.92Sep3133928@camelot.ai.mit.edu> <87858@netnews.upenn.edu> <ARA.92Sep4030328@camelot.ai.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 16:20:46 GMT
-
-
-
- In article <ARA.92Sep4030328@camelot.ai.mit.edu>,
- ara@zurich.ai.mit.edu (Allan Adler) writes:
- > Matt Wiener has apparently missed my point. Without some agreement as
- > to what one is supposed to be proving, there is no possibility of
- > mathematical proof.
- >
- > Allan Adler
- > ara@altdorf.ai.mit.edu
-
- It seems to me that what is supposed to be proving is the following
- theorem below the definition:
-
- Definition: God is Existence.
-
- Theorem: Existence exists.
-
-
- I think that Existence can never defined completely and theorem is
- something self-evident.
-
- Hannu.
-