home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!skule.ecf!rairan
- From: rairan@ecf.toronto.edu (RAI Ranjan)
- Subject: Re: p prime, p divides ab => pdivides a or b
- Message-ID: <Btyt2A.FM9@ecf.toronto.edu>
- Keywords: Contrapositive
- Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
- References: <Btyo8q.E63@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <BtyqL2.9A8@ecf.toronto.edu>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 19:06:10 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <BtyqL2.9A8@ecf.toronto.edu> rairan@ecf.toronto.edu (RAI Ranjan) writes:
- >In article <Btyo8q.E63@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charles Blair) writes:
- >>
- >> My recollection is that a number theory course I took presented
- >>this as a difficult result, only proved after doing some stuff
- >>with the Euclidean algorithm. Is there a proof which avoids that?
- >
- > So to prove p|(ab) => p|a or p|b, we just show that if p does not
- >divide a AND p does not divide b, then p does not divide ab. By the
- >Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic this is obvious. Euclid's algorithm is
- >not necessary. Indeed, the proof of the extended Euclidean algorithm
- >depends on this result, I think.
-
- YIKES!!! Ignore all this stuff above - it's all WRONG! I have gotten the
- whole thing in reverse. You try to be smart...
-
- I can just here them now: Engineers! HA! HA! HA! HA! :-)
- --
- Ranjan Rai <rairan@ecf.toronto.edu>
- Engineering Science 9T3 <rairan@eecg.toronto.edu>
- University of Toronto
-