home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!know!mips2!news.bbn.com!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!molest!carle
- From: carle@molest.ugcs.caltech.edu (Matthew Thomas Carle)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: A Math Induction Problem
- Message-ID: <carle.715150903@molest>
- Date: 30 Aug 92 05:01:43 GMT
- References: <17pjpeINNouf@matt.ksu.ksu.edu>
- Sender: news@cco.caltech.edu
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- Lines: 24
- Nntp-Posting-Host: molest.ugcs.caltech.edu
-
- bubai@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (P.Chatterjee) writes:
-
- >I have solved/near-solved a math induction problem. Was wondering if somebody
- could point out whether it's flawed or not.
-
- >I am trying to prove that n^3 + 5n is divisible by 6.
-
- >This is how I proceeded:
-
- >Assume k^3 + 5k = 6p.
-
- >Then, (k+1)^3 + 5(k+1) = k^3 + 5k + 3k^2 + 3k + 6
- > =6p + 6[(1/2)k^2 + (1/2)k + 1]
-
- >Does that make sense? Or, are 1/2 's disallowed?
-
- If you rearrange it, you get
-
- (k+1)^3 + 5(k+1) = 6p + 6[k(k+1)/2 + 1]. Either k or (k+1) must be even, so
- the portion in the brackets is indeed an integer.
-
- --
-
- "This .sig intentionally left blank."
-