home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.logic
- Path: sparky!uunet!destroyer!gatech!hubcap!fpst
- From: fpst@hubcap.clemson.edu (Steve Stevenson)
- Subject: Re: Synchonizing watches
- Message-ID: <1992Sep3.172632.10776@hubcap.clemson.edu>
- Organization: Clemson University
- References: <1992Sep1.234452.26917@tvnews.tv.tek.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:26:32 GMT
- Lines: 88
-
- dougs@tvnews.tv.tek.com (Doug Stevens) writes:
-
- >------
- >A and B are two people at two ends of a very slow telephone connection.
- >They are both completely cut off from the world except for their connection
- >with each other. In particular, they have no idea what time it is in the
- >real world.
-
- >There is a delay AB in the transmission of what is being said by
- >A to B, and a delay BA in the transmission of what is being said
- >by B to A. The delay AB does not equal the delay BA. The delays, for the
- >purpose of this problem, are on the order of minutes in each direction.
-
- >Both A and B have watches. Before they begin to talk, the watches are not
- >set to the correct time, nor are they set to the same time.
-
- >The problem is to devise a procedure such that A and B can, via their
- >telephone connection only, accurately synchronize their watches (to
- >within a few seconds). The watches do not have to reflect time in the
- >real world, but must match each other. Both A and B will know the procedure
- >before the call begins, and each will know whether he is A or B.
-
- I posted this problem to my news group, comp.parallel. Here are two
- solutions I've received. The first gives a solution and the second
- gives a Thinking Machines Corporation publication which deals with the
- problem
-
- =========================== MODERATOR ==============================
- Steve Stevenson fpst@hubcap.clemson.edu
- Administrative address steve@hubcap.clemson.edu
- Department of Computer Science, comp.parallel
- Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-1906 (803)656-5880.mabell
- ====================================================================
-
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 92 11:30:41 -0400
- From: Clark VERBRUGGE <clump@asparagus.cs.mcgill.ca>
- Message-Id: <9209031530.AA01758@asparagus.cs.mcgill.ca>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - A Solution -
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Let the local time of A be tA, and the local time of B be tB.
- Further, let tAB be the lag between messages going from A to B,
- and let tBA be the symmetric value. Since both time pieces
- are presumable ticking at the same rate, let tB = tA + C for some
- constant C. If we can determine C, then they can synchronize their
- watches.
-
- 1) A asks B the time. As s/he does, s/he notes how long it
- takes to hear the response from B. If B answers promptly,
- A will now know 3 things:
- (tA) (local time)
- (tAB + tBA) (total delay)
- (tA + C + tAB) (time told to A by B)
-
- 2) A subtracts the last value from the first two:
- (tA) + (tAB + tBA) - (tA + C + tAB) = (tBA - C)
-
- 3) B now asks A the time. A hears the request at time
- tA', notes this time and responds. B now knows:
- (tA' + tBA) (time told to B by A)
-
- 4) B tells A the value of (tA' + tBA). A can now calculate:
- (tA') + (tBA - C) - (tA' + tBA) = -C
-
- 5) A adds -C to his/her watch. Now both watches are in synch.
-
- Of course this algorithm can only be as accurate as the
- reaction time of the participants. It also assumes
- that tAB and tBA are constant.
-
- Clark Verbrugge
- clump@binkley.cs.mcgill.ca
-
- ====================================================================
- From: Barry Margolin <barmar@Think.COM>
-
- Take a look at the algorithms in the Network Time Protocol, RFC 1305. Or
- if the specific algorithms aren't a good match, the references (there are
- about 60 of them) at the end of the document should be useful.
-
- --
- Barry Margolin
- System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.
-
- barmar@think.com {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
-
-
-
-