home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!nic.unh.edu!kepler.unh.edu!pas
- From: pas@kepler.unh.edu (Paul A Sand)
- Subject: Re: Outgrowing Libertarianism...
- Message-ID: <1992Aug31.034235.9294@newshost.unh.edu>
- Sender: news@newshost.unh.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: University of New Hampshire
- References: <52630@dime.cs.umass.edu> <Btr6yr.H58@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <52684@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 03:42:35 GMT
- Lines: 59
-
- vy: victor yodaiken
-
- vy: [...] let's examine the "libertarian" position that one has the
- "right" to refuse service in a public place of business on the basis
- of racial bigotry. [...]
-
- Translation: libertarians believe that market transactions should be
- mutually voluntary.
-
- vy: The "libertarians" argue that it is moral to impose taxes for the
- purpose of paying for a police force which will enforce the racial
- prejudices of property owners by forcibly ejecting blacks, jews, or
- whatever from hotels, restaurants, banks, or any other "privately
- owned" place of business. [...]
-
- Translation: libertarians believe that A's presence on B's property
- should be agreeable to both A and B.
-
- vy: Thus, the "libertarians" find it perfectly moral to forcibly extract
- taxes from minority groups in order to violently oppress them. [...]
-
- Untranslatable, because false. Some (maybe most, by no means all)
- libertarians find taxation acceptable to adequately protect the rights
- of all individuals; to claim that the actual motive is "in order to
- violently oppress" minorities is baseless slander.
-
- vy: I find this repugnant and intellectually dishonest, but not "wrong",
- since it is a moral position, not a falsifiable one. [...]
-
- Certainly if Mr. Yodaiken was doing anything other than slapping
- together phrases from his cliche pile, he would have stopped to wonder
- if coherent moral positions can arise from intellectual dishonesty.
-
- vy: On the other hand, the "Libertarian" claim, which has been oft
- repeated in this forum, that under a free-market system such
- discrimination would be unprofitable and would render the racist
- business vulnerable to competition *is* wrong as anyone familiar
- with the history of race relations in the United States can confirm.
- That is, we see from US history that discrimination on the basis of
- race, religion, gender, or whatever, has been quite compatible with
- profitability, and that widespread racial or religious prejudice has
- worked to deprive certain segments of the population of a meaningful
- chance to compete on equal terms with the majority.
-
- Clearly, libertarian claims about what would happen under a free-market
- system have zero applicibility to (for example) an era in which the
- state enforced Jim Crow laws. Conversely, that era doesn't refute such
- libertarian claims. If anything, it should lead one to wonder why such
- laws were necessary: to force racists to practice racism?
-
- If Mr. Yodaiken thinks that *any* period in the history of US racial
- relations was marked by a legal and economic system that libertarians
- would find worthy of defending, he should specify the time and place.
- Otherwise, as he should know, his alleged refutation is nonsense.
- --
- -- Paul A. Sand | If I said that I was looking to buy a graphical
- -- Univ. of New Hampshire | user interface system which exhibits an
- -- pas@kepler.unh.edu | object-oriented-like behavior, does that mean I
- | want an OOy GUI? (Barry Warsaw, gnu.g++.help)
-