home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!att!princeton!taylor.princeton.edu!jmo
- From: jmo@taylor.princeton.edu (Mike Orszag)
- Subject: Re: RBC Modelling
- Message-ID: <1992Aug30.192114.9809@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: taylor.princeton.edu
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <92242.220031ECOKXP@BYUVM.BITNET>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 19:21:14 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <92242.220031ECOKXP@BYUVM.BITNET>, <ECOKXP@BYUVM.BITNET> writes:
- |> Well, perhaps to start a new thread, perhaps to fail...
- |>
- |> What is the perception out there in netland about the validity of
- |> Real Business Cycle models? Do they give us a reasonable and
- |> useful description of the macroeconomy? Does money matter?
-
- (1) stupid
- (2) on earth, no. There is a possibility that there may be
- some planet somewhere to which these models are applicable.
- (3) sort of.
-
- -- MIKE
-
-