home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!silver.ucs.indiana.edu!jwales
- From: jwales@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (jimmy donal wales)
- Subject: Re: Outgrowing Libertarianism...
- Message-ID: <Btr6yr.H58@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: silver.ucs.indiana.edu
- Organization: Indiana University
- References: <23020@hacgate.SCG.HAC.COM> <BtJoqq.362@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <52630@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 16:25:39 GMT
- Lines: 30
-
- Victor Yodaiken writes:
- >And there is no claim that the mean-spiritedness and
- >intellectual poverty of "libertarianism" implies in any way that it is
- >a "false" theory, merely that it is a repugnant one.
-
- How intriguing an epistemological position! Yodaiken is claiming
- that "libertarianism" suffers from 'intellectual poverty'.
-
- How can I best address this claim? Well, the usual approach to addressing
- such a claim would be to work through a point-by-point explanation
- of the theory, showing how each step is true. But notice that
- Victor claims that his claim about intellectual poverty is does
- not imply "in any way" that libertarianism is a false theory, only
- that it is 'repugnant'.
-
- Once one takes claims of intellectual richness and disconnects them
- from truth and falsehood... then where does one stand?
-
- Victor's statement can be translated as follows: "I don't care if
- everything that the libertarians say is true. I don't care if individual
- rights give us the best possible mechanism for assuring peace and prosperity.
- I don't care if socialism and interventionism simply don't work. Who
- cares which theory is true? Libertarianism is repugnant."
-
- This, friends, is intellectual poverty.
-
- --Jimbo
-
-
-
-