home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!pasteur!curtis
- From: curtis@berkeley.edu (Curtis Yarvin)
- Subject: Re: Science vs. story in SF (Was: World Cre
- Message-ID: <1992Aug30.200206.15450@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
- Sender: nntp@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU (NNTP Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: boa.cs.berkeley.edu
- Organization: CS Dept. Snakepit - Do Not Feed.
- References: <14720@mindlink.bc.ca>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 20:02:06 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <14720@mindlink.bc.ca> Crawford_Kilian@mindlink.bc.ca (Crawford Kilian) writes:
- >
- >Why would anyone go to the trouble of "loathing" a literary form? Would anyone
- >hate a haiku, scorn a sonnet, abjure an alliterative poem? If anatomy isn't to
- >one's taste, one avoids anatomy.
-
- And so I do.
-
- I apologize if I was not clear; I don't exactly seek out "idea fiction"
- for the pleasure of purging myself after the ordeal - gaping dry-mouthed
- over the porcelain going 'ock ock' - literary bulimia. No.
-
- Nonetheless it's difficult, when exploring a field, to avoid
- beforehand the pebbles in the peas. I usually quit well
- before the emetic point; but I have enough experience to loathe.
-
- >and what is it about high-plot, low-debate genres that interests us?
-
- Principally the lack of debate; though it's hardly enough on its
- own.
-
- Fortunately there are more dimensions to fiction than simply
- plot-versus-debate. If the only way to fill out word-count
- was an overinflated plot or a lot of empty blathering about
- some half-witted _idea_ you've had which is just so _keen_
- that everyone has to be _told_ about it, I'd have given up
- books long ago.
-
- c
-