home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!kithrup!hoptoad!brendan
- From: brendan@cygnus.com (Brendan Kehoe)
- Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
- Subject: Re: gcc2.2.2 and X11R5
- Message-ID: <34569@hoptoad.uucp>
- Date: 29 Aug 92 18:41:48 GMT
- References: <1992Aug20.125042.13301@midway.uchicago.edu>
- <1992Aug20.163706.1779@ennews.eas.asu.edu>
- <1992Aug20.165136.2723@ennews.eas.asu.edu>
- Sender: news@hoptoad.uucp
- Reply-To: brendan@cygnus.com
- Organization: Cygnus Support, Palo Alto, CA
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rtl.cygnus.com
- In-reply-to: scowen@wfpc3.la.asu.edu's message of 20 Aug 92 16:51:36 GMT
-
- In article <1992Aug20.165136.2723@ennews.eas.asu.edu> scowen@wfpc3.la.asu.edu (Paul A. Scowen) writes:
-
- My recommendation to all people out there attempting this is DON'T USE GCC
- vers 2.2.2 TO BUILD X!!! It does not appear to have what it takes.
-
- I built it with gcc2, and it works wonderfully. X11R5 patched to 16
- (I think it was), and the patches in README.X11 applied from the gcc
- 2.2.2 distribution. No other changes. I suggest you start from
- scratch, since you obviously configured something wrong.
-
- I strongly recommend you *do* use it; the performance improvements are
- noticeable, in addition to the size reduction (as compared to gcc1).
-
- --
- Brendan Kehoe brendan@cygnus.com
- Cygnus Support, Palo Alto, CA +1 415 322 3811
- Oooh! A handsome stranger! And me, without my shoes on.
- --The Princess, The Emperor's New Clothes
-