home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!cserver!edsi!gmeiers
- From: gmeiers@edsi.plexus.COM (Garrett Meiers)
- Subject: Re: Xenix considered harmful (was Re: SCO support - a success story)
- Organization: Enterprise Data Systems Incorporated, Appleton WI
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 05:53:21 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Sep04.055321.4375@edsi.plexus.COM>
- References: <9208290845.AA18903@dynamix.com> <BtsG0n.50u@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <1501@mgse.UUCP>
- Lines: 17
-
- marks@mgse.UUCP (Mark Seiffert) writes:
-
- >Not my world. Xenix is fine, especially when I am installing a
- >system were there will only be eight or less terminals, typically
-
-
- Who said Xenix is limited to 'eight or less' terminals??? The
- Xenix system I'm on now has 13 terminals attached plus the
- console. 3 of those terminals are dial-up. And we've had them
- all logged in at once... Unless I'm nuts. Or in a frantic
- dream...???
-
- ------
- gmeiers@edsi.plexus.com | spool!cserver!edsi!gmeiers
-
- ...Where theres a will theres a way...and if not, theres always
- control - alt - delete....
-