home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!gumby!destroyer!mudos!mju
- From: mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst)
- Subject: Re: Xenix considered harmful (was Re: SCO support - a success story)
- Message-ID: <Bu1rv1.5Ku@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 09:32:59 GMT
- References: <9208290845.AA18903@dynamix.com> <BtsG0n.50u@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <1992Sep3.110046.10391@zooid.guild.org>
- Organization: The Programmer's Pit Stop, Ann Arbor MI
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1992Sep3.110046.10391@zooid.guild.org> Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org> writes:
- >For running a Public Access Unix site I can't really think of a
- >better alternative. Reliability and more efficient use of CPU,
-
- That's interesting. I would have thought that for a public-access
- site, things like compatibility with the PD software out there and
- similarity with other Unix systems would be important. Xenix systems
- are not usually known for these qualities.
-
- --
- Marc Unangst | Real men don't use Windows. Real men use X.
- mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us | Only a real man would use a GUI where the
- | shift keys after "Alt" are "Super" and "Hyper."
-