home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!uwm.edu!zazen!doug.cae.wisc.edu!umn.edu!kksys.com!quest!digibd!dellr4.digibd.com!rhealey
- From: rhealey@dellr4.digibd.com (Rob Healey)
- Subject: Re: Summary: gcc 2.2.2 on Esix 4
- Organization: DigiBoard Incorporated, Eden Prairie, MN
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1992 19:13:41 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Sep01.191341.11673@digibd.com>
- References: <BttyC1.55r@ocsmd.ocs.com>
- Sender: @digibd.com
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <BttyC1.55r@ocsmd.ocs.com>, van@ocsmd.ocs.com (Van Gale) writes:
- |> A week ago I asked if anyone knew why cc1plus was receiving a signal 6
- |> and then dying. I only received two responses.
- |>
- |> First response: Problem occurs with -g. Don't do -g and everything is
- |> fine.
- |>
- A few weeks ago the person working on the DWARF code for SVR4
- explained that the debugging support in 2.2.2 was incomplete for
- C++ and as a result using the -g option for C++ code won't
- work. He also posted the patches that would let -g work in
- a limited manner. All this was in the GNU groups so check
- for back issues there for complete poop and the patches.
-
- -Rob
-