home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!dkuug!diku!joker
- From: joker@diku.dk (Morten Christian Holmgreen)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Subject: Re: Nanao 17" monitors
- Message-ID: <1992Sep4.002805.10331@odin.diku.dk>
- Date: 4 Sep 92 00:28:05 GMT
- References: <78788@ut-emx.uucp> <1992Sep1.012545.18976@bnr.ca> <5331@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>
- Sender: joker@ask.diku.dk
- Organization: Department of Computer Science, U of Copenhagen
- Lines: 33
-
- djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Sep1.012545.18976@bnr.ca> tracyb@bnr.ca
- >(Tracy Blomquist) writes:
-
- >>On another note, any other 17" monitors that will do 1280x1024 @ >=70Hz?
- >>I have found the NEC 5fg and the Nanao T560i so far, the former is in
- >>the running for my purchase, the latter is too many $$$.
-
- >I believe the Nanao 550i is similar in specs to the 560i, except that it
- >does not have the Trinitron ($$$) tube. Should be a bit cheaper than the
- >NEC 5fg. The 550i and 5fg are reviewed (FWIW) in PCMag XI/12 (30 June
- >1992); the Nanao blurb mentions the 560i, although it isn't explicitly
- >reviewed.
-
- Not quite correct, the IS a difference between F550i and T560i in the specs:
-
- F550i T560i
-
- Hor.scanfreq. 35-65Khz 30-78Khz
- Ver.scanfreq. 55-90Hz 55-90Hz
- Bandwidth 80Mhz min. 120Mhz min.
-
- Max. res. 1280x1024 (I) 1280x1024 (NI)
-
- I'm using the T560i and it's a GREAT monitor, although I'm "only" using
- it in XGA.
-
- Christian
- --
- M. Christian Holmgreen / joker@diku.dk / mochmch@uts.uni-c.dk
- student, University of Copenhagen, Dept. of Computer Science
- "Human errors can only be avoided if one can avoid the use of humans"
-