home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!pa.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!csc32.enet.dec.com!j_manning
- From: j_manning@csc32.enet.dec.com (John Manning)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Subject: Re: 486 DX vs DX2: What's the difference ?
- Message-ID: <1992Sep1.141437.20568@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com>
- Date: 1 Sep 92 15:12:05 GMT
- References: <1992Aug31.135129.164432@dstos3.dsto.gov.au> <92244.103320REE700A@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> <1992Aug31.200534.15561@tssi.com> <1992Sep1.052448.6162@u.washington.edu>
- Sender: usenet@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com (USENET News System)
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
- Lines: 19
-
-
- In article <1992Sep1.052448.6162@u.washington.edu>, tvp@gibdo.engr.washington.edu writes...
- >In article <1992Aug31.200534.15561@tssi.com> nolan@tssi.com writes:
- >><REE700A@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes:
- >>
- >So there you have it. Hope this helps. (BTW: Occidental's 486DX2/50
- >(with 8MB RAM, 240MB 12ms IDE hard drive, one (of eight) local bus
- >slots, and SAME DAY SHIPPING) looks pretty good at $2495 depending on
- >the video card they're using (The ad doesn't say what it is.).
- >
-
- I took advantage of Occidental's faxback service to get specs on their
- offerings. The only bad thing(and this is a matter of perspective) is that
- their 240MB HD is a Seagate.
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | John Manning | Opinions expressed are my own. |
- | j_manning@csc32.enet.dec.com | I do not represent Digital Equip. |
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-