home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!kakadu1!qwerty
- From: qwerty@ecr.mu.oz.au (Morgan_Charles SANDERCOCK)
- Subject: Re: Falcon3: Durundals!
- Message-ID: <9224809.16454@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
- Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU
- Organization: Dept. Engineering Computer Resources, Melbourne Uni.
- References: <1992Sep1.190719.18128@newshost.lanl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 23:45:38 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1992Sep1.190719.18128@newshost.lanl.gov> Gavin Adams <gavin.adams@lso.mts.dec.com> writes:
- >Just a quick question on the use of Durundals:
- >
- >I line up on the runway, drop the D's, and fly home. Taking a look at my
- >ACMI tape, 3 out of 6 hit the runway. Out of the 3 that did hit, they
- >were off to one side of the runway. The section hit was light grey, and
- >seemed to be buckled. I didn't get credit for the hit (my primary
- >target), and want to know if I did actually affect the runway.
-
- The light grey area means you did hit the runway but if you are using an
- older patch version of Falcon, the mission recorder is invariably wrong.
- I have had stupid events like pilot "ooooooo" launching 4 AMRAAMs with no
- hits while the kills totals show 6 A-A kills.
-
-
- Now, is this the .sig sent with news or mail?
- Only you will know...
- -qwerty@ecr.mu.oz.au (forwarded to) qwerty@mundil.cs.mu.oz.au
-