home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!jamie
- From: jamie@cdevil.unx.sas.com (James Cooper)
- Subject: Re: Ramsey considered dangerous. Why?
- Originator: jamie@cdevil.unx.sas.com
- Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Electronic Cocktail Party)
- Message-ID: <Bu07nH.M4x@unx.sas.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 13:18:52 GMT
- References: <02jn56=.damiel@netcom.com>, <cedD3uW00j_HIIO5gH@cs.cmu.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cdevil.unx.sas.com
- Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
- Lines: 25
-
-
- In article <cedD3uW00j_HIIO5gH@cs.cmu.edu>, Michael.Witbrock@cs.cmu.edu writes:
- >> Excerpts from netnews.comp.sys.amiga.misc: 2-Sep-92 Re: case #77a.1:
- >> -----rw-d.. Michael Sinz@cbmvax.comm (1750)
- >
- >> >
- >> >(cpu-control, ramsey, pp, decigel020, rad:, faccII, fontcachex, star,
- >> ^^^^^^
- >
- >> Word to the wise: This may be a very dangerouse program to run...
- >> There is no need to run this as the OS does the "right thing"
- >
- >
- >Dangerous in what way? Fry chips dangerous or crash programs dangerous?
-
- Corrupt data in memory - trash hard drive - crash machine hard type of
- dangerous. As has been mentioned is several posts here in the past.
-
- --
- ---------------
- Jim Cooper
- (jamie@unx.sas.com) bix: jcooper
-
- Any opinions expressed herein are mine (Mine, all mine! Ha, ha, ha!),
- and not necessarily those of my employer.
-